BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:Linklings LLC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Seoul
X-LIC-LOCATION:Asia/Seoul
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0900
TZOFFSETTO:+0900
TZNAME:KST
DTSTART:18871231T000000
DTSTART:19881009T020000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20230103T035311Z
LOCATION:Room 323\, Level 3\, West Wing
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Seoul:20221208T113600
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Seoul:20221208T114800
UID:siggraphasia_SIGGRAPH Asia 2022_sess257_gp_138@linklings.com
SUMMARY:Multisensory Proximity and Transition Cues for Improving Target Aw
 areness in Narrow Field of View Augmented Reality Displays
DESCRIPTION:Talks\n\nMultisensory Proximity and Transition Cues for Improv
 ing Target Awareness in Narrow Field of View Augmented Reality Displays\n\
 nMarquardt\n\nAugmented reality applications allow users to enrich their r
 eal surroundings with additional digital content. However, due to the limi
 ted field of view of augmented reality devices, it can sometimes be diffic
 ult to become aware of newly emerging information inside or outside the fi
 eld of view. Typical visual conflicts like clutter and occlusion of augmen
 tations occur and can be further aggravated especially in the context of d
 ense information spaces. In this paper, we evaluate how multisensory cue c
 ombinations can improve the awareness for moving out-of-view objects in na
 rrow field of view augmented reality displays. We distinguish between prox
 imity and transition cues in either visual, auditory or tactile manner. Pr
 oximity cues are intended to enhance spatial awareness of approaching out-
 of-view objects while transition cues inform the user that the object just
  entered the field of view. In study 1, user preference was determined for
  6 different cue combinations via forced-choice decisions. In study 2, the
  3 most preferred modes were then evaluated with respect to performance an
 d awareness measures in a divided attention reaction task. Both studies we
 re conducted under varying noise levels. We show that on average the Visua
 l-Tactile combination leads to 63% and Audio-Tactile to 65% faster reactio
 ns to incoming out-of-view augmentations than their Visual-Audio counterpa
 rt, indicating a high usefulness of tactile transition cues. We further sh
 ow a detrimental effect of visual and audio noise on performance when feed
 back included visual proximity cues. Based on these results, we make recom
 mendations to determine which cue combination is appropriate for which app
 lication.\n\nRegistration Category: FULL ACCESS, EXPERIENCE PLUS ACCESS, T
 RADE EXHIBITOR\n\nLanguage: ENGLISH\n\nFormat: IN-PERSON
URL:https://sa2022.siggraph.org/en/full-program/?id=gp_138&sess=sess257
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR